SDG 12 - Sustainable Consumption And Production Relevance to the Electronics Industry
Relevance to the Electronics
Industry
“The earth
will not continue to offer its harvest, except with faithful stewardship. We
cannot say we love the land and then take steps to destroy it for use by future
generations.”
― Pope
John Paul II
Introduction
News
articles pertaining to harmful effects of waste are becoming commonplace in
today’s newspapers. Some of the recent headlines are - “Bacterial communities
destroyed in NCR due to electronic waste production”; “Solid waste of chemicals
released from e-waste pollutes the drinking water for residents of Kolkata“;
“Waste of Electrical and Electronic equipment (WEEE) corresponds to 8% of
municipal waste in 2004 and has been growing by around 5% since then”.
These
highlight the growing crisis of waste and in particular, E-waste. E-waste is a
recent phenomenon that is a byproduct of the electronics revolution. The
Sustainability Development Goal 12 for ‘Sustainable Consumption and Production
deals with E-waste and if implemented correctly, such cases of dire negligence would never
emerge. The sword ‘negligence’ highlights the magnitude of the problem at hand.
There are different kinds of consumption, in the entire supply chain from raw
material consumption on the one hand to final product consumption like
Electronics, FMCG products, plastics etc. By far, metal and e-waste has been
unique in that it is not only extremely harmful with risks of poisoning the
basic food and water but also a vast majority of users’ lack information as to
how to recycle, discard or consume diligently.
Growth
rates of electronic consumption all over the world are accelerating. India for
example generates 2 MT of e-waste annually and a surprising 95% of WEEE is
recycled in the informal sector. India ranks fifth in the world in the
production of e-waste. Developing nations have not formed effective systems in
place for establishing policies for foreign deregulation. Short sightedness on
manufacturing of PCs, Smartphones etc. in the last decade due to the absolute
advantage of cheap labour and fixed capital is haunting countries like India
now. Developed nations have been major polluters for a long time however with the recent news of garbage dumps
being imported to USA from Philippines this business must be taken seriously.
It is estimated that three earths would be needed to satisfy the needs of the
population by 2050 if the present level of consumption is continued and
disposal is continued. Stakeholders from
Governments, NGOs, private bodies, corporations and consumers should come
together and form robust policies that are not just remedial but preventive in
nature.
Analysis
India
today has the world’s second largest internet user base, with 12% of all
internet users Indian residents. This is a measure of the electronic devices in
use in India, as a proportion of the global use. India imports more than half
of its electronic goods, with the import of electronic goods in FY 2019
touching 11 trillion rupees. All of this will, one day, need to be disposed of.
India’s phenomenal growth since the liberalization that brought the IT and
telecom boom, has effectively also brought a mountain of e-waste to our shores
with no existing processes in place to handle the sheer volume of the waste.
Today’s
markets are driven purely by economic considerations and corporations aim
solely toward maximizing shareholder value and minimizing costs. This laissez
faire neo-liberalism championed by eminent economists such as Milton Freidman
while effective in increasing prosperity have come at an enormous cost of
environmental damage. Disposing industrial effluents by dumping them in the
Ganges can be a very cost effective solution; but it’s hard to argue that that
produces a fair or even an economically efficient outcome in the long run. E-Waste,
which contains hazardous heavy metals which pollute groundwater, needs to be
handled well (such as by recycling), instead of (cheaply) being dumped.
The
solution we need today is dedicated infrastructure, markets, processes and
oversight to dispose of electronic goods at the end of their useful lives. Most
of the e-waste in India today is handled by the informal sector where processes
meant to sustain marginal players such as waste pickers drive the handling of
extremely hazardous electronic waste. We need to do much better to improve the
life outcomes of people in this industry while ensuring that waste management
processes are geared primarily towards safe and sustainable disposal rather
than marginal profiteering.
Relevance
to India
With a
significant increase in per capita incomes of Indians, the consumption of
electronic devices (such as mobile devices, televisions, air conditioners,
kitchen appliances etc.) has increased tremendously. Apart from the
functionality being offered, the devices also serve as status symbols for the
people which has given a boost to their consumption and the re-purchase cycles.
Additionally,
the longevity of the electronic devices has decreased over the past few years,
which is an additional contributor to the increased frequency of repurchase and
therefore, increased consumption.
The
consumption of home kitchen appliances has been increasing rapidly over the
past two decades in the country. These appliances are instrumental in relieving
pressures for the time-crunched population. The fast paced lifestyles of the
individuals is not the only driving force behind the increase in purchase of
such appliances. The increase in employment of domestic help, has further
triggered the increasing purchase trend.
A host of
economic challenges prevent an environment friendly production of electronics
goods in India. The production of eco-friendly components requires expensive
raw materials which have a low accessibility. A huge investment is required in
the R&D of developing environment friendly electronics. Additionally,
setting up a waste processing plant is a major cost head. The increased costs
cannot be transferred to the customers, since India is a developing nation and
the purchasing power of the majority of the population is not very high. These
factors hugely impede the setting up of a more sustainable production process
in place.
Business
Implications
In 2015,
the market size for electronics hardware in India was approximately USD 64
billion. 42% of this market was met by domestic production and electronic items
were among the top three imports by value. India imported products due to the
high current demand for Electronic System Design and Manufacturing (ESDM)
products. With technological progress, the prices of entry-level electronic
goods have come down dramatically in recent times and this figure would easily
cross USD 100 billion by 2020.
The major
contributors to this are people choosing buying over repair and planned
obsolescence by major companies. Whether from breakdown, slow-down, or just the
availability of a newer model, people discard electronics at the slightest
inconvenience. In some cases, for example, buying a new printer is cheaper than
buying a set of new ink cartridges and so the economics of gadgets encourages
disposal. Built-in obsolescence increased the proportions of all units sold to
replace defective appliances from 3.5 percent in 2004 to 8.3 percent in 2012,
which also prevents the second-hand markets such as Ebay and OLX to grow.
The
potential implications to business include the huge commitment to end
unsustainable consumption and production patterns. For about 78% of companies,
SDG12 is one of their most important goals for the organisation, which is a
good sign. This suggests putting an end to the current practices that are not
in tandem with the goal, introduce policies to actively monitor the industry as
well as reform techniques that have dominated the sector since years.
Following
WEEE laws (Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment) around the globe,
producers of electronic materials are obligated to take part in industry-wide
national reverse supply chains to uphold their producer responsibility by
establishing recycling firms or collaborating with the existing ones. Supply
chain collaboration involves two or more organizations working together to
achieve success while sharing the investments required and collectively find
solutions.
The
electronics industry can also benefit from analysing opportunities for future
innovation in products, services and business models. Investors are
increasingly paying attention to environmental, social and governance (ESG)
risks when making investment decisions. According to the third EY Investor
Survey (2017), weak corporate governance, poor environmental performance,
resource scarcity, climate change and human rights risks are most likely to
alter investors’ decisions. Consumers can also be called more environmentally
conscious, since they are increasingly interested in knowing the origin of
their products and what companies are doing in the area of environment
conservation and protection. Though many companies engage in green marketing to
the extent of green washing to increase their sales by going for a pull
strategy, there are some examples such as Samsung Electronics, who have done
serious work in the form of door-to-door collection of e-waste at just a call’s
length.
The
government could impose export limits on manufacturers where the quantity of
goods that can be exported should be directly proportional to the amount of
e-waste the company has recycled or re-used. Then, there needs to be an
effective way to ensure that these returned devices get repurposed. Governments
could also give some form of tax break or rebate for companies that effectively
process old equipment and companies could reuse recovered parts from discarded
goods in newer systems, thus incurring lower costs than having to procure all
new parts. Partially recycled devices could be sold in markets where buying
capacity is limited but demand exists, so second-hand device or assembled
devices would be accepted or they could be marketed as “reclaimed,” offering a
social benefit even in wealthy markets. Another lucrative option is committing
to repairing smartphones and computers. Electronics repair would not only
increase product durability while building customer trust, but also help reduce
unemployment. Companies and NGOs could set up simple training centers where
people could learn the skills and manufacturers could provide better access to
repair options and facilities.
References
Ahmed, S. (2019). The Global Cost of
Electronic Waste. [online] The Atlantic. Available at:
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/09/the-global-cost-of-electronic-waste/502019/
[Accessed 5 Dec. 2019].
Awasthi,
A. K., Hasan, M., Mishra, Y. K., Pandey, A. K., Tiwary, B. N., Kuhad, R. C.,
... & Thakur, V. K. (2019). Environmentally sound system for E-waste:
Biotechnological perspectives. Current Research in Biotechnology, 1, 58-64.
Awasthi,
A. K., Zeng, X., & Li, J. (2016). Environmental pollution of electronic
waste recycling in India: A critical review. Environmental pollution, 211,
259-270.
Discover
Society. (2019). Sustainable Consumption in the Context of India. [online]
Available at:
https://discoversociety.org/2016/01/05/sustainable-consumption-in-the-context-of-india/
[Accessed 5 Dec. 2019].
Ey.com.
(2019). Why Sustainable Development Goals should be in your business plan.
[online] Available at: https://www.ey.com/en_gl/assurance/why-sustainable-development-goals-should-be-in-your-business-plan
[Accessed 5 Dec. 2019].
Greenbiz.com.(2019).
[online] Available at:
https://www.greenbiz.com/sites/default/files/document/Sustainability_Final.pdf
[Accessed 5 Dec. 2019].
Ijmbs.com.
(2019). [online] Available at: http://www.ijmbs.com/13/devesh.pdf [Accessed 5
Dec. 2019].
Ris.org.in.
(2019). [online] Available at: http://ris.org.in/pdf/SDGs_Report_Chapter_12.pdf
[Accessed 5 Dec. 2019].
Sdgresources.relx.com.
(2019). Economic and environmental assessment of recycling and reuse of
electronic waste: Multiple case studies in Brazil and Switzerland | Sustainable
Development Goals - Resource Centre. [online] Available at:
https://sdgresources.relx.com/economic-and-environmental-assessment-recycling-and-reuse-electronic-waste-multiple-case-studies
[Accessed 5 Dec. 2019].
World
Economic Forum. (2019). The Indian miracle state pointing the way to global
sustainability. [online] Available at:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/09/accelerating-sustainable-production-for-a-responsible-future-of-production/
[Accessed 5 Dec. 2019].
Gu, Y.,
Wu, Y., Xu, M., Mu, X., & Zuo, T. (2016). Waste electrical and electronic
equipment (WEEE) recycling for a sustainable resource supply in the electronics
industry in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 331-338.
Yang, S.,
He, M., Zhi, Y., Chang, S. X., Gu, B., Liu, X., & Xu, J. (2019). An
integrated analysis on source-exposure risk of heavy metals in agricultural
soils near intense electronic waste recycling activities. Environment
international, 133, 105239.
Comments
Post a Comment